Location "Vogelvlucht" in the county called Goes in "Zeeland", the Netherlands.

A peaceful and safe location for people with easy going psychiatric disorders like ASD .

 

Function Inverter     Send me an e-mail here:  Maarten Tom de Hoop    Worth for quantumuniverse.eu SUDOKU!


Back to the Dutch Blog

How do I see myself?

My ASS problems?

Black Holes

Our reality understood!

A non-reducible description of our Universe

Conclusions in English

What is Dark Matter made of?

Downloadable PDF's with results and conclusions.
26 particles
Elementary particles?
What is mass?
Handedness!!
What the heck are spinless particles!?!

Hunting the Higgs

Gauge Symmetry is an anti-symmetrical symmetry!

Bell's frustrations about QM completely solved in this short weblog!

A Theory Of Everything
Mathematical Knots
Axioms of QFT
A Theory Of Everything!  
Our Big Bang

 

This is Tom de Hoop horse-driving with Choise.. .
ACHENBACH
Ir. M.T. de Hoop
Born on: 13-08-1965
in Delft
Lion

Final Conclusions:

Einstein's CAP demands all elementary particles to be described extended in the 2D-plane orthogonal to the direction of motion. This extendedness explains the QM spin completely. The elementary spinless (scalar) Higgs particle is fiction due to not taking into account the gravitational action in any QM analysis!

All 2D-string theories are mathematical wrong, because these theories assume a more then 4D-spacetime, of which 6 or 7 are contracted to the Planck-length! in a so-called Calabi-Yau manifold.

 Moreover, Superstring only is valid if Super-Symmetry is valid. Super-Symmetry contradicts any valid non-reducible description of physics on all aspects!

 

 


Albert Einstein: If you can't explain it simply, you júst don't understand it well-enough!

Quantum Mechanics
, as it came to life via the Copenhagen interpretation between 1925 and 1927 is an analyzed not even Complete Non-Reducible set-of easy linearly "mathematical" Point-Particles analyses. As a direct result it has to use math. non-logical so-called intrinsic properties related to the different analyzed stable “Quantum Particles” in our universe!

Albert Einstein tried to solve required curvature of easy imaginable 4D-Spacetime resulting from the always dependent & present Gravitational-field in the higher-dimensional so-called Riemannian-manifold.
However, the
only reason for curvature of 4D-Spacetime just is the fundamental
elementary ónly symmetrical spin 2 of the (invisible) Graviton!

In line with Albert Einstein's theory of General Relativity any valid math. model of reality must comply to the Comprehensive Action Principle, i.e. always include the dependent, so also required, (orthogonal ónly elem. symmetrical spin 2) Gravitational-field.

NB Albert Einstein never realized these "difficult" QM requirements of his developed CAP himself, because he just didn't like the non-logical behavior of these in his linear logical-eyes really mis-understood “Stupid Statistical Quantum Mechanical analyses of reality!

As a direct consequence all 26 different elementary particles which represent everything possible in our universe with just 3 conserved Fermi-Families must be analyzed as logical Spacetime-like extended easy linearly analyzed ideal harmonic oscillatingmathematical” objects.

Einstein's Nobel-prize of the Photo-Electric effect proofs that the EM-field is CN represented by Photons, he very probably disliked the used simple Point-Particles analyses of QM, even though all particles all possess conflicting Energy proportional to a Frequency E = h · f:

Energy implies not Point-like Spacetime-like extensiveness with Ideal Harmonic Oscillating Properties!

The conserved physical phenomenon called spin or more literally “conserved intrinsic angular-momentum in the direction-of-motion” just cannot be interpreted as a math. logical-concept!

Therefore, to analyze still not-understood “Quantum Mechanics” CN math. Logical Consistently compliant to the CAP, stable elementary and CAP-dual otherwise stable compound “Particles” must be described CN as math. dual (orthogonal in 2 different ways*) oscillating identities:

Ideal Harmonic Oscillating math. Point-Waves in the 2D-Plane* Perpendicular to the Direction-of-Motion (SR world-line) with CAP- dual Open- or Closed- Boundary Conditions.     (1)

As a direct result all stable particles must have energy linear-proportional to a frequency & conserved non-zero Angular-Momentum in the direction-of-motion (Helicity of the CAP-dual 2 perpendicular zero rest-mass bosons {Graviton & orthogonal Photon} & Chirality in all other “massive”-cases). This last-property is usually called spin as an incorrectly assumed so-called “intrinsic” property of elementary always analyzed math. Point-Particles in the still not-understood so-called QM A CAP-dual logical math. CN theory where all possible particles with all their required extended properties are explicitly described & explained CN according to (1) to math. logically explain QM spin.

CAP-dual, force-fields are either elementary spin 2 Symmetrical described by the orthogonal, so invisible, masses > 0 -related Graviton or orthogonal  spin 1 Anti-Symmetrical non-zero charge-density related force-fields, described by so-called Gauge-Symmetries. The CN Gauge-Symmetry of 4D-Spacetime & CAP-dual 4D-Momentumenergy analyses are just the always used Gauge-Symmetries of the Standard-ModelU(1) x SU(2) x SU(3): U(1) x SU(2) describe the U(1) – EM-field CN describing the Photon with it's (spin) 1 x (anti-symmetrical) 6 = 6 degrees-of-freedom and the 3 SU(2) – Gauge-Symmetry both charged (non-zero charge-densities) and massive (rest-masses > zero) weak nuclear force bosons {W±, Z} mixed by the Weinberg-angle. The last possible Gauge-Symmetry, SU(3) describes the 3 Fermi-Families in our universe with only different rest-masses resulting into CAP-dual 2 x 3 = 6 different spin 1½ so-called Quarks {(up, down), (charm, strange), (top, bottom)}, which in the also not-understood so-called Quantum Chromo-Dynamics of QM are incorrectly assumed to be (stable) spin ½ fermions with as a direct result of that also required so-called also dual (spin ±½) Isospin ½!

Here it must be noted that compliant to the CAP all possible math. expressions of reality must be described with stable elementary Leptons and CAP-dual compound spin ½ fermions, i.e. Baryons, the primary sources of all bosons. Fermions are described math. with Open- Boundary Conditions & Bosons must be described math. with Closed-BC as described by easy imaginable expression (1).

The conserved physical phenomenon called spin or more literally “conserved intrinsic angular-momentum in the direction-of-motion” just cannot be interpreted as a math. logical-concept!

The required CAP-dual math. analyses of any correct model of reality is CN related to the always present Rotational-Symmetry of analyzed (elem. or compound CAP-dual) stable particles.

The conserved Angular-Momentum in the Direction-of-Motion is a conserved property of stable particles as a direct result of Rotational-Symmetry when rotating the QM wave-function (1) of a particle around its axis-of-motion (SR worldline): Spin of particles in the direction-of-motion is conserved as a result of Rotational-Symmetry after a rotation over  = radians around the axis-of-motion with s the half-integer spin of elementary fermions or the positive integer spin of stable energetic-oscillating elementary bosons. To obtain the actual angular-momentum with the correct dimensional proportionality-constant, s must of-course still be multiplied by Dirac's constant (reduced Planck constant)h-bar ħ  = h/(2π), with h the Planck constant.

All stable elementary Matter-Particles, so-called Fermions with CAP-dual half-integer spin-values s {½ (leptons & stable fermionic hadrons called baryons), 1½ (always connected & non-stable single quarks)} must be described with Open-BC. This explains why they all have conserved rest-masses > zero & (also required CAP-dual) conserved non-zero Bohr magnetons.

This math. explicitly described (CAP-dual) conserved spin (in the direction-of-motion) at-once makes it evident that still assumed to be valid elementary spinless bosons (Higgs mechanism) which as a direct consequence just cannot carry energy proportional to a frequency must be discarded as a (math.) incorrect assumption!At the following link the remaining readable derivation & explanation of Quantum Mechanics is described:

Continue Reading..   .

Elementary spinless bosons just cannot possess energy proportional to a frequency & the orthogonal only symmetrical spin 2 Graviton múst be included in the re-written QM-model independent from all 3 “simple” anti-symmetrical spin 1 Gauge-Symmetry remaining fundamental-forces. This CN proves the so-called Higgs mechanism with the ónly elementary spinless Higgs-boson to explain particles-masses greater than zero simply non-logical & non-compliant to (1) as being incorrect!

2019
Last change: 07-12-2019 18:31:40