**In QM all
appearing mathematical problems**
are solved using spinless elementary particles!
In **
QM** complex math is used
with all characteristics given by the so-called __
Hilbert-space__.
In **
QM** all elementary particles are described mathematically using a
**4D**-spacetime position which gives the position of the so-called particle.
All characteristics of this particle are given by the **
QM**
so-called state-function.
It is often assumed that **spin**, i.e.
intrinsic angular momentum, is described
mathematical by a vectorbundel which has to be extracted from the **
QM** state-function of this particle.
A simple **SR** analysis shows **spin** can't be explained with the **
QM**
state-function with a vectorbundel integrated over all space around the
mathematical position of this particle.
This is why in **
QM** **spin**
is called
**intrinsic angular momentum**,
but is NOT understood
using a **SR** description. In **
QM** **spin**
is used ad-hoc
completely!
**
QM** Point
particles are able to reach exactly the same
space-time position.
This is why divergences occur in **
QM** which result in many
mathematical problems which are most easily solved introducing
unknown spinless particles!
In **
QM** the
ad-hoc
used
**spin**
requires
far too little
requirements. In the
standard model of **
QM** an assumed elementary
particle with
spin **s**
= 3**h**,
with **
h**
Dirac's constant, or any elementary
spinless
particle are all allowed in the ad-hoc
used **
QM** without any problems!
In this way all
mathematical problems of standard **QM** are solved using spinless
elementary particles.
Among many other not
mentioned
elementary spinless
particles which are all assumed to solve mathematical problems of
the **
not understood**
**
QM** I only mention the most impressive
assumed
spinless elementary
particles, which are proposed to explain **
QM** mathematically:
**1.**
**
Higgs**
boson. Only after use of this still not found
elementary particle, all
standard model masses of all elementary particles can be added
mathematically
correctly in a **SR** linear mathematical description, which does
**
NOT**
comply to **Einstein**'s **CAP**!
**2.**
**
Axion**,
a spin-, charge- and almost massless elementary particle is assumed to explain the dark
matter and
energy.
To me all dark mass and energy are completely explained by a very
dense background of
neutrinos.
**3.**
**
Instanton**,
is a difficult problem in **
QFT** , because it's an elementary particle which mathematical
is possible.
They are possible
spinless
solutions of the equations of motion and
result in **
QFT**
in so-called quantum corrections of the classical solutions of the
equations of motion.
**4.**
**
Super partners**
of all fermions of the standard model described with **
QFT**.
In the standard model all possible fermions are
**
spin½**
fermions and the
ad-hoc
assumed
**
Super partners**
appear to be
spinless
elementary bosons. The **3** families
of elementary particles result, using this analysis, in **3**
spinless
bosons, which only differ in mass. Bosons are described
mathematically with closed **
BC** and as a result of that only allow one species of each
non-reducible symmetry group.**
Super Symmetry**
came to life from stringtheories in which the
**
QM**
is again used
ad-hoc,
i.e. not understood. This mathematical analysis appears correct
mathematically only after demanding this
**
symmetry**
of this description, i.e.:
**fermions ↔ bosons**.
All observed so-called spinless
appearances are only possible as compound elementary particles which
resonate mathematical together.
To me it's
**100%**
sure that any
spinless elementary
particle will never be detected,
because such **
imagined**
mathematical constructions do not oscillate, i.e. can't carry energy!
I.e. any elementary particle without any possible energy just can't
be there, i.e. just is **
fiction**!
Last change:
26-02-2011 17:51:42 |