__Shall the
spinless Higgs boson ever be found?__
At his
web log
**Edward Witten ** is sure the elementary spinless so-called
**
Higgs**
boson exists.
His view on the **
Higgs**
boson is given on his
weblog at the **
IAS**
at **Princeton**, New Jersey,
USA: at the (many MB's**!**)
link
Hunting the Higgs given more accessible at:** **
**
Hunting the Higgs**
In
1998
a mathematical analysis showed me that
**
spin**
just is a simple required characteristic of **
QM** to comply to
**Einstein**'s
**
C**(omprehensive)**A**(ction)**P**(rincipe).
With **CAP**
**Einstein** proved that all possible actions in our **4D**-spacetime
universe are dependent of the **
spin2**
gravitational action, which must be described using curvature of
space-time.
To my opinion this is the only reason that the gravitational action
must be described using a **
spin2** boson.
Outside non-relevant singularities (**Black Holes** and so-called **
Big Bangs**) curvature of space-time is described mathematical
non-reducible with a
doubling of degrees of
freedom.
Any mathematical description of this required characteristic is only
possible with a linear description, to be able to differentiate and integrate
quantities.
This
relativistic analysis must be dealt with mathematically from a **SR**
viewpoint, i.e. the **CAP**
demanded doubling of degrees of freedom must be solved in a **SR** linear
space-time.
Mathematical all elementary particles must be solved as harmonic
oscillating points in the **
2D**-plane orthogonal to the
observed direction of motion (**i.e. SR** worldline).
All solutions not only appeared in
complex space-time, but also appeared to have all characteristics of __
Hilbert-space__.
In this way problem **6** of the
**23** problems of David Hilbert appeared to be solved
exactly.
**Conclusions:**
Elementary spinless particles
aren't allowed mathematically.
All observed spinless manifestations are only possible as compound elementary
particles, which must be described mathematical using a resonance.
An elementary spinless particle analyzed mathematically can only
travel it's **SR** worldline. Such particles can't oscillate,
i.e. can't possess any energy!
In
1988
I assumed the
spinless
**
Higgs**
boson to be compound, to be able to exist as a mathematical
resonance.
In my finishing thesis of
1989 I described and analyzed
a compound **
Higgs**
boson build from **2** fermions, a complete misunderstanding of
the always used **QM** finally made me conclude that all elementary spinless
particles are mathematically nothing but
fiction.
In the in
2008
still not understood **
QM**
all __frustrating not understood problems__
are solved using elementary
spinless
particles. To me this results from the mathematical fact that the
**on****ly**
possible elementary particles are
spinless
in a complete linear
mathematical, i.e. standard **
QM** description, all **
QM**
not understood problems of our world are solved mathematically in this
way.
To me it is
**100%**
sure that an
elementary
spinless
particle will never be observed,
because such **
fictive**
mathematical constructions can't oscillate, i.e. do NOT carry any energy!
Last change:
04-10-2015 19:06:55 |