My home is "Vogelvlucht" in the municipality of Goes in "Zeeland", the Netherlands.

A peaceful and safe location for people with easy-going psychiatric disorders like ASD.

Also read the following mostly used Diagnostic criteria for Asperger's Syndrome

 

Function Inverter     Send me an e-mail here:  Maarten Tom de Hoop  Mobirise website-builder: QuantumUniverse.MobiRiseSite.com


Black Holes

Our reality understood!

A non-reducible description of our Universe

Conclusions in English

What is Dark Matter made of?

Downloadable PDF's with results and conclusions.
26 particles
Elementary particles?
What is mass?
Handedness!!
What the heck are spinless particles!?!

Hunting the Higgs

Gauge Symmetry is an anti-symmetrical symmetry!

Bell's frustrations about QM completely solved in this short weblog!

A Theory Of Everything
Mathematical Knots
Axioms of QFT
Theories Of Everything!  
Our Big Bang

 

This is Tom de Hoop horse-driving with Choise.. .
ACHENBACH
Ir. M.T. de Hoop
Born on: 13-08-1965
in Delft
Lion

Final Conclusions:

Einstein's CAP demands all elementary particles to be described extended in the 2D-plane orthogonal to the direction of motion. This extendedness explains the QM spin completely. The elementary spinless (scalar) Higgs particle is fiction due to not taking into account the gravitational action in any QM analysis!

All 2D-string theories are mathematical wrong, because these theories assume a more then 4D-spacetime, of which 6 or 7 are contracted to the Planck-length! in a so-called Calabi-Yau manifold.

 Moreover, Superstring only is valid if Super-Symmetry is valid. Super-Symmetry contradicts any valid non-reducible description of physics on all aspects!


Albert Einstein:
 If you can't explain it simply, you jú
st don't understand it well-enough!

GR CAP => QM => TOE
=> QM

Quantum Mechanics
Compliant to Albert Einstein's CAP, the Graviton múst be included in any model of reality & Only 4D-analyses are able to describe (math. Closed-) Knots (i.e. allow fermions) => Stable Particles can ónly be analyzed (*CAP-dual) as:

Ideal Harmonic Oscillating math. Point-Waves in the 2D-Plane* Perpendicular to the Direction-of-Motion (SR worldline) with CAP- dual Open- (fermions) or Closed- (bosons) Boundary Conditions.   (1)

CAP- dual, force-fields are either elementary spin 2 Symmetrical described by the orthogonal, so invisible, rest-masses > 0 - related Graviton or visible analyzable spin 1 Anti-Symmetrical non-zero charge-densities (=> rest-masses > 0) related force-fields, described by so-called Gauge-Symmetries. The C(omplete)N(on-Reducible) Gauge-Symmetry of only-possible 4D-Spacetime & CAP- dual 4D-Momentumenergy analyses are the always used Gauge-Symmetries of the in-complete Standard-Model U(1) x SU(2) x SU(3): U(1) x SU(2) describe the U(1) EM-field describing the Photon CN representing the EM-field with it's (spin) 1 x (anti-symmetrical) 6 = 6 degrees-of-freedom and the 3 SU(2) – Gauge-Symmetry both charged (non-zero charge-densities) and massive (rest-masses > zero) weak nuclear force bosons {W±, Z} mixed by the Weinberg-angle. The last possible Gauge-Symmetry, SU(3) describes the 3 Fermi-Families with ónly different rest-masses (> 0) resulting into CAP- dual 2 x 3 = 6 different spin 1½ so-called Quarks {(up, down), (strange, charm), (top, bottom)}, which in the also not-understood so-called Quantum Chromo-Dynamics of QM are incorrectly assumed to be (stable) spin ½ fermions with as a direct result of that also required so-called also dual (spin ±½) Isospin ½!

Notify, that compliant to the CAP all possible math. expressions of reality must be described with stable elementary Leptons & CAP-dual compound spin ½ fermions, called Baryons. Fermions the primary-sources of all bosons are described with Open - Boundary Conditions & Bosons múst be described with Closed-BC (allowing CAP-dual 2 zero rest-mass bosons), see expression (1).

The math. explicitly described (CAP- dual) conserved spin (in the direction-of-motion) makes it evident that still assumed to be valid elementary spinless bosons (Higgs mechanism) which as a direct result can not carry energy proportional to a frequency must be discarded as an incorrect assumption!

Albert Einstein's theory of General Relativity, which was solved in a higher-dimensional Riemannian-manifold to describe gravitational-curvature of 4D-Spacetime, was not solved correctly! Spin 2-dual Curvature of the ónly Fermions (Open-BC => knots!) allowing easy imaginable 4D-Spacetime & (CAP-dual) 4D-Momentumenergy Analyses must be included to describe Physics compliant to the CAP! QM models use an analyzed not even (required necessary) Complete Non-Reducible set-of easy linear, i.e. "mathematical", Point-Particles analyses. As a direct result these models have to use math. non-logical so-called "intrinsic" properties related to the analyzed 26 different stable “Quantum Particles” in our 3 Fermi-Families universe!

All stable (elementary & compound) "quantized" Particles always have Energy ÷ Frequency f: E = h · f = ħ · ω

Always required Energies > 0 of Quantum Particles implies NOT Point-like Spacetime-like extensiveness with conserved Ideal Harmonic Oscillating Properties!

All elementary particles have Conserved (experimental-proven) Non-Zero Angular-Momentum in the Direction-of-Motion (Helicity of the CAP-dualorthogonal zero rest-mass bosons {Graviton & Photon} & Chirality in all other “massive”-cases) related to their conserved "oscillating" energies usually called Spin, which in QM is incorrectly assumed to be an intrinsic property of stable analyzable QM Pointlike-Objects.

In line with Albert Einstein's theory of General Relativity any valid model of reality must comply to the Comprehensive Action Principle, i.e. always include the dependent, so required, (orthogonal ónly elem. symmetrical spin 2) Gravitational-field!

NB Albert Einstein never realized these "difficult" QM requirements of his developed CAP himself, because he didn't like the non-logical behavior of these in his "math." linear logical-eyes really mis-understoodStupid Statistical Quantum Mechanical analyses of reality!

Einstein's 1st Nobel-prize of the Photo-Electric effect proofs that the EM-field is CN represented by Photons, but he disliked the used simple Point-Particles analyses of QM, even though all particles have Energy proportional to a Frequency! I.e. No ideal conserved harmonic oscillating energy => No Spin => No Stable elem. Particle!

So, to analyze “Quantum Mechanics” CN  Logical Consistently compliant to the CAP, stable elementary and CAP-dual otherwise stable compound “Particles” must be described CN as math. dual (orthogonal in 2 different ways*) ideal oscillating identities (1) above:

Ideal Harmonic Oscillating math. Point-Waves in the 2D-Plane* Orthogonal to the Direction-of-Motion (SR worldline) with CAP- dual Open- or Closed- Boundary Conditions.

So, elementary particles have Energy proportional to a Frequency & Conserved non-zero Angular-Momentum in the direction-of-motion (Helicity of the CAP-dual 2 perpendicular zero rest-mass bosons {Graviton & orthogonal Photon} & Chirality in all other “massive”-cases). The last-property is usually called spin (in the direction-of-motion) as an incorrectly assumed so-called “intrinsic” property of elementary always analyzed math. Point-Particles in the still not-understood so-called QM A CAP-dual logical (math.) CN theory where all possible particles with all their required extended properties are explicitly described & explained CN according to (1) to math. logically explain QM spin math. solved in the resulting Complex-dual Hilbert-Space of not-understood QM.


2021
Last change: 14-02-2021 17:00:18